Categories
Free Speech Sex and Gender

Lib Dems squash internal revolt on trans rights

The party appears to be in thrall to Gender Identity Ideology. That is the belief that we all have an innate gender identity, which should displace biological sex in law and policy.

The Liberal Democrats are once again debating transgender rights at their Autumn Conference today [28 Sept 2020]. Motions on topics close to the hearts of the Lib Dems — Human Rights and the Home Office, Fairer Corporate Taxation, even the European Union — were all discarded to make space for Business Motion F32, Supporting Trans and Non-Binary People in the Liberal Democrats.

The party appears to be in thrall to Gender Identity Ideology. That is the belief that we all have an innate gender identity, which should displace biological sex in law and policy. Lines 14 and 15 of the motion contain the central catechism: Trans women are women, trans men are men and non-binary identities are non-binary.

Dissent would seem impossible in the party following the adoption last weekend of a definition of transphobia that condemned, “phrases or language to describe trans people which are designed to suggest that trans people are a separate category of person from the gender they identify as.”

Nevertheless, a group of 13 rebels objected to this patently unscientific imposition on their conference. Stephanie Wilson — member of the Party from Lewes, and one of the 13 — told me that, “we submitted a request for a separate vote on lines 14 and 15 of the motion because we believe it’s possible to create a welcoming environment for trans people without forcing people to sign up to a metaphysical belief.”

However, the Liberal Democrat Federal Conference Committee (FCC) thought differently. The request was struck down unanimously according to rebel group. A member of the FCC told them that, “the clause was a central part of the motion and the principle underpinning much of what it called for. A separate vote was — in the opinion of the FCC — tantamount to a vote against the motion.”

Let’s be clear, this was listed as a business motion, not a debate on party policy. But as Wilson said to me:

The fact that our amendment was refused makes it clear that the people making these decisions are not actually interested in supporting trans people, but rather imposing absolute ideological compliance throughout the party. This is in total opposition to our constitution, which says ‘no-one shall be enslaved by conformity’.

Stephanie Wilson, Liberal Democrats

The motion is scheduled to be called at 7.40 pm this evening [28 Sept 2020]. It remains to be seen whether the party will allow an open debate or use the new definition of transphobia to silence any concerns.


Debbie Hayton

* This article was first published before the debate by Unherd on 28 September 2020: Lib Dems squash internal revolt on trans rights.

Motion F32 was carried by 520 votes to 74.

By Debbie Hayton

Physics teacher and trade unionist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s