Which toilets should transwomen use?

Clear policy is needed, and we all need to respect it. Because inclusion that really matters for trans people is not access to single-sex spaces but equal treatment as human beings out in the conference hall.

Which toilets should transwomen use? Transsexuals have used women’s facilities for decades – without problems, or so we are told – but appeals to history provide poor support to arguments. Even asking the question provokes strong emotions, but we need answers if we hope to defuse what has become a febrile territorial dispute over women’s spaces.

Clear policy promotes confidence, but it also requires courage. Should women be told to make room for males? Or should transsexuals be blocked from spaces they thought were theirs by right? Ambivalence, however, is not an option. The published report of a trans comedian forcing the issue at the recent LGB Alliance Conference means that this debate is now urgent.

When I transitioned in 2012, access to women’s spaces was an assumed right. Nobody consulted women, of course, but there was also the expectation that I would change my hormone regime and seek gender reassignment surgery. There was a process to follow and a barrier to entry. Transexuals were rare and, when the goal was to avoid attention, inclusion seemed to work.

But times have changed. The transgender umbrella has become a marquee that extends far beyond medical transitioners. Today, service providers are faced with a much broader group of people. Even if it was right to include transsexuals in the past, the current situation is very different. Without the tools to distinguish post-op transsexuals from the rest, the old rules are no longer fit for purpose.

We all know that men and women pose different risks, and we therefore treat men and women with different degrees of caution. When my children were young, for example, I told them to seek help from women if they became lost. Not because I thought all men were potential abusers, but I couldn’t identify them from the rest. Basic safeguarding requires that we apply the same rules to all men.

Abusive males will go to extreme lengths to access women when they are vulnerable; if they can sidestep safeguarding procedures by identifying as women, some may well do so. Certainly it is a safeguarding weakness that we would be very foolish to ignore.

Changes in society may have lowered the barrier to entry to be considered a transwoman but women’s spaces were always for women. Transsexuals have always been guests, often uninvited, and our presence was always an imposition. Safeguarding is one concern, but single-sex spaces help to maintain dignity and respect. As a boy, for example, I knew the discomfort the boys felt if a girl wandered into our space: the embarrassment was palpable.

When we demarcate the sexes, we would need very good reasons not to draw the line according to biology.

When I transitioned, I thought I was some kind of women so I used women’s toilets without a second thought. I knew that I wasn’t a danger, but the women around me didn’t. Perhaps the suggestion of gatekeeping reassured women, but that illusion is now much harder to maintain.

Even where I am known and among friends, letting me in inevitably leads to pressure from others, “you let Debbie in, why not me?” Women should not come under that pressure. Inconvenient truths are still truths. Transwomen are not women: we are the opposite sex. For that reason alone, I need to stay out.

I’ve shied away from saying this because I know transwomen who transitioned decades ago. Some pass so well that those around them do not clock them. Why should they change what they have done for 30 or 40 years? They need to at least consider it because the world has changed. If we genuinely respect the sex that we claim to identify with then, we need to recognise their boundaries.

That doesn’t mean we should use the men’s; that would be a false dichotomy. Additional single-use facilities can and do work for anyone who does not wish to share communal facilities with their own sex.

Modern buildings tend to include them. At the recent LGB Alliance conference the unisex toilets worked just fine when nature called. The transwoman forcing the agenda was doing so for political reasons rather than out of necessity. Organisations struggle to respond when the reaction is likely to be accusations of transphobia, or even threats of legal action. But this is a nettle that must be grasped.

Clear policy is needed, and we all need to respect it. Because inclusion that really matters for trans people is not access to single-sex spaces but equal treatment as human beings out in the conference hall. That was happening at the LGB Alliance Conference where trans people were accepted as friends and allies, and that is something that we can all celebrate.

Debbie Hayton is a transgender teacher and journalist

* This piece was first published by Lesbian and Gay News on 8 November 2021: Debbie Hayton: Which toilets should transwomen use?

Why not sign up to the Lesbian and Gay News Conversation? Membership starts at just £15.00

By Debbie Hayton

Physics teacher and trade unionist.

4 replies on “Which toilets should transwomen use?”

Thanks for answering a question I have long wanted to ask, Debbie. Yes, the problem is the men who will go to extraordinary lengths to access vulnerable women, The proverbial wolves in sheep’s clothing. Again, how does one distinguish the genuine from the fake? You responded so well to the senior citizen who asked you if you were ‘one of them blokes.’ But nowadays, women are too scared to ask a perceived male what he is doing in the ladies’ lest this unleash a storm of abuse and prosecution for a hate crime. I think the govt should take steps to a sensible conclusion. Not steps that biological exclude women and women’s rights.

Liked by 1 person

I grew up like most everyone who lives in a house or apartment with gender neutral bathrooms. My college even had gender neutral multiperson bathrooms. You get used to it and norms are different. Many of the businesses and newer buildings switching to single person unisex bathrooms anyway since there is no real space saving in large bathrooms for many people and they are a relic of times when it was more of a plumbing issue with large heavy iron or steel pipes.

The “potty-parity” issue came up in the town where I live, originally a campaign for more women’s restrooms. The data collected was interesting. Women already had more facilities and also they were cleaned more regularly, decorated, larger, less malfunctioning equipment, and many had locking doors that men’s rooms didn’t. Diaper changing equipment is still mostly located in the women’s restrooms so dads have to go out to the car or figure something else out.
Plumbing issues are no longer a reason to divide people based on gender. To me it’s akin to having drinking fountains separated by race.

C’mon, a few people are bad independent of gender. You say that anecdotal evidence isn’t sufficient yet give nothing concrete yourself as to why men are more dangerous, just an anecdote on what you told your kids.
1 out of 100,000 men might hurt you and 1 out of 1000 women may shame you. Mothers beat children at least as much as fathers. Stop with the stereotypes.


An excellent article. Which I’ve had the courage to share on social media. That’s a first for me. Thank you Debbie. Your work is so important.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s