Categories
Legal

The UN is wrong about Britain’s treatment of trans people

A wise government would simply just dismiss Madrigal-Borloz’s statement as the opinion of someone who spent his time listening only to those who reinforced his worldview

Is Britain a hostile environment for trans people? The United Nations’ independent expert on sexual orientation and gender identity has delivered his verdict – and it isn’t good. Victor Madrigal-Borloz, a lawyer from Costa Rica, said following a ten-day visit to the country: ‘I am deeply concerned about increased bias-motivated incidents of harassment, threats, and violence against LGBT people, including a rampant surge in hate crimes in the UK.’

But his statement was stronger on rhetoric than evidence. An unnamed ‘elected officer’ in Belfast told him that ‘I have never seen so much unadulterated hatred as currently directed toward the trans community’. He also claimed in his report, which is to be presented to the government, that an anonymous MP remarked that ‘there is more fear in the streets than there used to be’.

And if those encounters weren’t sufficient to drive home his case, he cited a ‘Welsh civil society representative’ who bemoaned the ‘frequent posting of messages on Twitter by a prominent politician that appeared to be opposed to LGBT persons’ equal enjoyment of human rights’.

But I have found it hard to square these descriptions with the tolerant, diverse and accepting society that I know the UK to be. 

During Madrigal-Borloz’s visit, in which he assessed the state of LGBT rights in the UK, he explained that he had ‘received information about thousands of articles spreading misinformation and witnessed first-hand the casual appropriation by top-level political actors of rhetoric deeply associated with the questioning of legal protections on the basis of gender reassignment’. A key example? The question ‘what is a woman’. This seemingly unacceptable discourse, he declared, ‘is commonly asked by “gender-critical” actors to challenge the legal recognition of trans women under UK law’.

Let’s just stop there. It is a perfectly reasonable question with a perfectly clear answer: a woman is an adult human female. That doesn’t challenge anybody’s rights – it is a statement of biological truth. But in these strange times, it seems that even science might be seen by some as transphobic.

An otherwise uninformed reader of this statement might imagine that the UK is a miserable place for trans people. Madrigal-Borloz reported that some trans people are ‘so scared that they do not leave their homes’, and said that one Scottish trans man had told him that ‘Westminster is trying to terrorise us’. I worry that the fear is of fear itself. 

A wise government would simply just dismiss Madrigal-Borloz’s statement – all 94 paragraphs of it – as the opinion of someone who spent his time listening only to those who reinforced his worldview. For example, while the UK government is preparing transgender guidance for schools, Madrigal-Borloz held a meeting with ‘a leading organisation working with LGBT youth in the UK’. This mysterious outfit was alarmed that schools might be advised to report ‘trans children’s gender identities to their parents’ and that those children might be excluded from single-sex spaces and sports activities.

Of course, parents should expect to be told when their children are dabbling in a culture that celebrates the medical and surgical transition of youngsters. And female pupils also have rights, specifically to single-sex spaces and single-sex sport, something that that the so-called independent expert appears to overlook.

After its meeting with Madrigal-Borloz, the LGB Alliance – a charity that supports people who are same-sex attracted – was unimpressed. It described him as being ‘ignorant about many of the threats to homosexuals’. In its published account of the meeting, the LGB Alliance said that he had not even heard of Keira Bell – the young detransitioner who famously took the Tavistock’s gender identity service for under-18s to the High Court. But detransitioners upset the narrative that everyone has a gender identity that must be affirmed. As the LGB Alliance pointed out: ‘Around the world, children and young people who do not conform to sexist stereotypes are being told the lie that it is possible to change sex and that it may be desirable to do so. This lie is leading them to make irreversible, damaging and totally unnecessary changes to their bodies.’

But if activists get their way, talking therapy may be even harder to access. Across the world there has been a co-ordinated campaign to stamp out conversion practices. It’s unclear why this has become so urgent, certainly in the UK where abusive and coercive practices are already illegal. But the man from the UN recalled in several meetings his global call to end practices of conversion. He reported that the UK government informed him that ‘it had finalised consultations in relation to draft legislation for England and Wales, and that it is committed to publish the draft legislation for pre-legislation scrutiny in the current parliamentary session’.

This worries me greatly. I am concerned that this legislation might prevent therapists from engaging in normal exploratory therapy with young people. Anything short of immediate and unquestioning affirmation could be framed as an attempt to change a client’s gender identity – an accusation that could also be made against well-meaning family members.

Madrigal-Borloz indicated his readiness to provide technical advice on any such bill. The government should file that offer in the same place as it should file his statement.


Debbie Hayton is a teacher and journalist.

* This article was first published by The Spectator on 13 May 2023: The UN is wrong about Britain’s treatment of trans people.

Debbie Hayton's avatar

By Debbie Hayton

Physics teacher and trade unionist.

4 replies on “The UN is wrong about Britain’s treatment of trans people”

I wonder, is there a UN Independent Expert on Protection against Violence and Discrimination Based on Freedom of Speech in Academia? Or just generally? Where are the protections for such people as Kathlene Stock against angry mobs screaming hate speech through megaphones at her because she has an opinion about what human sex is (the fact that it’s correct even being irrelevant)?

I’ve not read the whole report yet, but I get to paragraph 2 and find the usual insane hyperbole that pours forth from trans-promoters like they’ve had lobotomies in the night: “While the human rights of these more than 2 million persons are of direct concern to the mandate of the Independent Expert, concentric circles around them extend to all who love them, respect them, depend on them and in many other ways benefit from recognizing and respecting their right to exist in this world.”

Why is unbridled access to hormones and surgical body-modification a “human right”, and why is questioning it couched in genocidal rhetoric?

Like

Until the trans activists are prepared to acknowledge that what they are demanding is negatively affecting the rights and feelings of biological women and that we need to come to a conclusion that makes both groups feel comfortable the bad feelings generated on both sides will continue to escalate. This is madness and completely counter productive. While we continue to fight each other the global agenda which seems to be designed to restrict all our lives moves merrily on.
I was looking up data on violence against trans people and the Office for National Statistics seem to be struggling to come up with any conclusive figures at all. The evidence currently seems to be largely unofficial and therefore can’t be assumed to be unbiased. The sad truth is though that these constant standoffs will result in more hate crime. Intimidation is not the way to convince people it just makes them resentful.

Liked by 1 person

Yeah. I’m pretty sure a big part of the problem is that the trans issue is an offshoot of a broader push by ultra-liberal academia to promote (rather than even just protect) the “rights” of minorities, such that “violence” has been redefined to include having a different opinion and voicing it. The principles of free speech and academic discourse have been swamped by so-called “political correctness” and so-called “social justice”. So, violence and hate crime now include using the wrong pronouns or stating that sex is binary and immutable. Or anything the totalitarian regime denounces as heresy. The funny thing is, when I argue for caution and gatekeeping and intelligent assessment of risk, etc., I’m often called a fascist and sometimes told to shut up, go away and die. I was actually called “subhuman” the other day. I guess they didn’t agree with my views.

Liked by 1 person

Apparently there are 67 UN countries where homosexuality is still illegal so perhaps Madrigal- Borloz should start his enquiry there rather than stirring up trouble here.

Liked by 3 people

Leave a comment